|
|
by Donna M. Brinton, Christine Holten, and Jodi L. Nooyen Background | Classroom Applications | Internet Resources | Appendices Background Scientists have recently completed a preliminary map of all the genes in the human body. This is also known as the Human Genome Project and consists of all the sequences of DNA chemical units that tell a cell how to behave. This accomplishment has incredible benefits. However, it also raises new, complex issues that society cannot ignore. This chapter explores the following questions:
The chapter gives an overview of the technologies that have been developed as a direct result of DNA and genetic research. It also gives students the chance to debate the ethical questions surrounding this technology. Background Information Reflecting on the ethical challenges created by genetic research findings, former U.S. President Bill Clinton said, As we consider how to use new discoveries, we must also not retreat from our oldest and most cherished values.... Increasing knowledge of the human genome must never change the basic belief on which our ethics, our government, our society are founded. All of us are created equal, entitled to equal treatment under the law. British Prime Minister Tony Blair also discussed the need to use this new technology responsibly: We cannot resist change, but our jobindeed, our dutyis to make sense of change, to help people through it, to seize the massive opportunities for better health and better quality of life and then, with equal vigor, to minimize the threats such developments pose. DNA testing: Advantages and Disadvantages The ongoing project to map the human genome affects all of us in several key areas. The first is DNA testing. This subfield of gene research uses tiny human tissue samples of 100200 cells (for example, blood, hair, saliva) to identify DNA patterns. These samples are used to establish a persons identity, for example, in (1) tests for blood relationships such as parenthood, (2) identification of criminals (rapists, murderers), and (3) proving the innocence of people falsely accused of a crime. In this testing, the DNA pattern of a persons hair, blood or saliva is matched with a similar DNA sample from a second person. For example, when establishing parenthood, DNA from the mother or father is matched with DNA from the fetus or child. When identifying criminals, DNA samples from the crime scene are matched with a suspects DNA. Some benefits of DNA testing are clear and unquestioned. It is a key tool in the criminal justice system, helping courts to discover whether a person suspected of committing a crime is guilty or innocent and helping police to find criminals. It has even been used to prove the innocence of criminals on death row many years after a crime was committed. In addition, it is replacing genealogy and family trees as a method for determining ancestry. A famous case is the link that was established between the children of Sally Hemmings, a black slave, and U.S. President Thomas Jefferson. Finally, this test has also been used to establish the identity of dead bodies. One example of this occurred several years ago when a body was removed from the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Washington D.C. and the identity of that soldier was determined. In most cases, DNA testing has been beneficial. However, for those who wish to hide their identity (such as fathers who do not want to take financial responsibility for their children), it has unwanted consequences. For families researching their background, it is much more reliable and less time-consuming than constructing the genealogy of a person. However, it can also reveal things that they do not want to know, forever changing a persons concept of family and self. Furthermore, DNA testing has become a business. Even funeral homes and burial services now offer to save DNA samples (e.g., hair, blood) for a fee. This raises questions of both privacy and ethics. What are the rights of the dead person? Who has access to these samples? How and where should they be stored? What happens to the samples if the storage company goes bankrupt? Genetic Testing for Diseases: Advantages and Disadvantages Genetic testing for diseases is also a significant part of our lives now. The sequencing of the human genome has made it possible to identify and link genes to diseases such as Tay-Sachs, diabetes, breast cancer, and even obesity. As these genes are identified, tests are also developed to detect their presence in human tissue samples. This technology is being put to use in several ways. It allows parents to identify the genetic features of a baby before it is born, young adults to determine whether they have inherited the genes for a particular disease, and scientists to create computer data banks that contain information from genetic testing. Below is a list of diseases that may be caused by damaged genes and an explanation of these diseases.
Although this area of research appears to be similar to DNA testing, it has more potential disadvantages. While genetic testing allows parents to determine if their unborn baby will suffer from any life-threatening illnesses or profound mental defects, it also brings with it the possibility that parents might try to create designer babies. Genetic testing gives adults access to information about inherited diseases that can be successfully controlled or treated through changes in lifestyle or medication. However, if the disease is incurable and devastating (for example, Alzheimers, Huntingtons, Lou Gehrigs disease), living with this knowledge may be more of a curse than a blessing. It may affect peoples decisions about whether to have children or to get married. In short, it may change their lives completely. In extreme cases, it may even lead them to consider or attempt suicide. We may have too much faith in genetic testing. Because of these tests, we tend to believe that our genetic inheritance is our destiny. However, the tests themselves are problematic in several ways. First, they are not always 100 percent accurate. The technology is still relatively new and the results of genetic tests, like any other medical tests, can be misinterpreted. Second, even if a test shows that an individual carries the gene for a disease, this does not necessarily mean that he or she will get the disease. Other factors such as lifestyle, diet, and even the environment may have more effect upon a persons health than the presence of the gene. Thus, while information from genetic testing may provide important clues about our health, it should not change the way that we define ourselves. In addition to these practical and ethical concerns about genetic testing, this technology may threaten a persons right to privacy. Since the information from genetic testing is stored in a computer, it can be accessedboth by those who have legal right to see it (for example, a doctor) and those who do not (an employer). An important concern here is that insurance companies, employers, and the media might find information and use it against an individual, for example, to deny them insurance coverage or to fire them from a job. Similarly, in an election campaign, the media might reveal medical information about a candidate that would seriously hurt his or her chances of being elected. Benefits and Dangers of Gene Therapy In addition to genetic testing, which detects diseases, scientists are beginning to develop therapies to treat diseases that have a genetic origin. This therapy works in two ways. In the first, gene transfer, researchers replace bad DNA with good DNA. In the second, gene repair, researchers block or stop the action of a harmful gene. These therapies are still highly experimental, and there have been numerous side effects during testing such as fevers, abnormal blood clotting, partial paralysis, and even death. One extreme instance of such problems happened with Jessie Gelsinger, who died after receiving genetic therapy at the University of Pennsylvania in the U.S.. Doctors inserted a cold virus into Gelsingers liver in order to cure his genetic disease. Instead, the therapy caused his immune system to attack and destroy not only the harmful virus but also his heart, liver , and kidneys. This case is especially regrettable because scientists encouraged the patient to undergo this therapy, but did not tell him about the potential dangers. In addition to the physical dangers of gene therapy, there are also ethical issues. At what stage in a persons illness will gene therapy be usedas soon as the illness is discovered or only after all other traditional methods have failed? Who will be responsible for conducting gene therapyuniversity researchers, medical doctors, or pharmaceutical companies? Who will have access to this expensive technologypeople in rich, developed countries or people in poorer, developing areas of the world? These and other questions will continue to concern society as DNA and gene technology advance.
Glossary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|